Advanced Semiconductor Laboratory
Developing cutting-edge technologies based on III-nitride semiconductors

Blog Posts

Difficulty in predicting the accurate bandgaps of semiconductors

Muwei Zhang

December 24, 2016 - Posted in Discussion
Band structures always play a very important role in materials application or devices design. It reveals the basic electronic properties like bandgaps, effective masses, etc. For decades, as a computer method of predicting the materials properties, the first principle calculation can give us very satisfied results such as total energy, Fermi levels, showing good agreements with the experiments. However, the theoretical description of band structures by the first principle calculation remains a very challenging problem, mainly due to the inaccuracy of density function exchange correlations.

Generalized Gradient Approximations (GGA) and Local Density Approximations (LDA) are the most commonly used exchange correlations. For most of materials, they can present reasonable bandgaps giving a good agreement with the experiments. But for some materials, like III-Nitride semiconductors, their bandgaps are always underestimated by GGA or LDA. Under the Kohn-Sham DFT theory, multiple electrons interactions will be simplified as a non-interaction system with the same electron density, as a result, those exchange correlations will give the exact total energy and properties related to the electron density. However, the wave functions and orbital energies are given as byproducts. Those byproducts can lead to the similar band structures under the average field. Although the byproducts present accurate qualitative diagrams of the energy bands, they can’t predict bandgaps quantitatively because of the ignorance of multiple particles interactions, especially for semiconductor systems.

Several solutions have been introduced to solve this problem. One is the so-called GW approximation, which is different from the DFT at the exchange correlation part. For DFT, we introduce the exchange correlation operator to simplify the multiple particles interactions; for GW approximation, we derive the Hedin equations to get the operator through the Green’s function multiplying the shielding effect of coulomb’s interaction. Mathematically, GW method will require several orders of magnitude higher computing resources than the normal DFT calculation. That’s the reason it’s only applied to the small system. Another solution is the hybridization of Hatree-Fork theory and DFT, we will not discuss the HF theory any further, but applying the method will overestimate the bandgaps. So if we can combine HF and DFT together somehow, we can make a better description of bandgaps without costing so much resources like GW approximation.

In 2016, Jason. M et al. made a comparison with different calculation methods describing the bandgaps, from the figure below, we can know that the hybrid functions are more efficient than others, although all of them had some disadvantages for certain materials.

1.      Crowley J M, Tahir-Kheli J, Goddard III W A. Resolution of the Band Gap Prediction Problem for Materials Design[J]. The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2016, 7(7): 1198-1203.

Leave a Comment
* Comment: